Your legal AI may be
high-risk from December 2027.
The EU AI Act classifies as high-risk the AI systems used by judicial authorities, or on their behalf, to research and interpret facts and the law (Annex III, point 8). A legal AI tool can be high-risk when it is used in the administration of justice. 42% of European law firms already report concern about liability for their AI tools.
AI in production with no technical documentation or governance
From 2 December 2027, the EU AI Act requires technical documentation, risk management, audit logs and human oversight for high-risk AI systems used in the administration of justice. Most legaltech platforms and law firms already using AI tools do not have that documentation.
The EU AI Act classifies as high-risk the AI systems intended to assist judicial authorities, or those acting on their behalf, in researching and interpreting facts and the law (Annex III, point 8). Contract analysis or document management in a law firm does not automatically fall into that category: each use has to be assessed. High-risk systems require documented risk management, auditable logs, bias testing and human oversight. 42% of European law firms already report concern about liability for their tools.
A contract analysis tool that produces systematic errors without anyone having formally checked it is a professional risk, not just a technical one. Generic QA is not designed to validate high-risk tools under the EU AI Act.
Managing payroll and contracts for a team spread across three European countries under three different legislations consumes management resources that a law firm or legaltech platform should be devoting to its core business.
Technical and operational governance for legal environments
QA for high-risk legal AI systems
Acceptance criteria aligned with Articles 11, 12 and 14 of the EU AI Act: technical documentation, auditable logs and human oversight of every impactful action. Validation of contract analysis, document management and decision support tools before deployment.
Staff augmentation for legaltech engineering
Backend, data engineering and cybersecurity profiles with European regulatory awareness. Assessed with a practical test before presentation. Onboarding in two weeks. Free replacement if the fit is not right within the first two weeks.
People Operations for distributed teams
Payroll, contracts and employment compliance under European legislation across multiple jurisdictions. Structured onboarding with a 30/60/90-day plan. No need for a local subsidiary to bring on staff in a new European country.
Cybersecurity for litigation and contract data
Privileged communications, case files and contracts require specific controls. Penetration testing and monitoring adapted to the risk profile of a law firm or legaltech platform. Incident response SLA guaranteed by contract.
AI with structural human oversight
Procedures, regulations and internal documentation available to the team on a self-service basis. Reduces repetitive internal queries. No impactful action without explicit human approval. EU AI Act compliant.
In development · waiting listAssessment of legal AI tools from extraterritorial providers and their exposure under the EU AI Act and the GDPR. 8 dimensions, aligned with the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework.
In servicePenetration testing and SOC adapted to environments where client confidentiality is a legal requirement, not just a contractual one. Reports with technical detail and an executive summary included.
In serviceThe compliance you advise on, applied internally too
We operate under Estonian law with full European compliance. Client data and case files processed exclusively on EU servers. NDAs adapted to the specific confidentiality of the legal environment included in every contract.
Do your AI tools in production have technical documentation for the EU AI Act?
2 December 2027 is the deadline for Annex III high-risk systems. Within 48 hours we will assess your compliance gap and design an action plan.